Review



eno3  (Novus Biologicals)


Bioz Verified Symbol Novus Biologicals is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Novus Biologicals manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Novus Biologicals eno3
    SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and <t>ENO3.</t> Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) <t>Enolase</t> enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.
    Eno3, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/eno3/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    eno3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Non-orthosteric inhibition of enolase 1 impedes growth of triple-negative breast cancer"

    Article Title: Non-orthosteric inhibition of enolase 1 impedes growth of triple-negative breast cancer

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102451

    SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and ENO3. Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) Enolase enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.
    Figure Legend Snippet: SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and ENO3. Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) Enolase enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.

    Techniques Used: Drug discovery, Labeling, Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, Expressing, Western Blot, SDS Page, Control, Enzyme Activity Assay, Positive Control



    Similar Products

    93
    Sino Biological eno3
    SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and <t>ENO3.</t> Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) <t>Enolase</t> enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.
    Eno3, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/eno3/product/Sino Biological
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    eno3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech anti phospho tdp 43
    SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and <t>ENO3.</t> Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) <t>Enolase</t> enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.
    Anti Phospho Tdp 43, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti phospho tdp 43/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti phospho tdp 43 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech anti eno3
    SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and <t>ENO3.</t> Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) <t>Enolase</t> enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.
    Anti Eno3, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti eno3/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti eno3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Absolute Biotech Inc rabbit polyclonal anti human eno3
    SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and <t>ENO3.</t> Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) <t>Enolase</t> enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.
    Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Human Eno3, supplied by Absolute Biotech Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal anti human eno3/product/Absolute Biotech Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal anti human eno3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Sino Biological h07e
    SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and <t>ENO3.</t> Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) <t>Enolase</t> enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.
    H07e, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/h07e/product/Sino Biological
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    h07e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    sino biological 14270-h07e
    SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and <t>ENO3.</t> Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) <t>Enolase</t> enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.
    14270 H07e, supplied by sino biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/14270-h07e/product/sino biological
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    14270-h07e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Novus Biologicals eno3
    SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and <t>ENO3.</t> Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) <t>Enolase</t> enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.
    Eno3, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/eno3/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    eno3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    novus biologicals NBP1-31764
    SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and <t>ENO3.</t> Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) <t>Enolase</t> enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.
    Nbp1 31764, supplied by novus biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/NBP1-31764/product/novus biologicals
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    NBP1-31764 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech eno3 rabbit proteintech
    SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and <t>ENO3.</t> Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) <t>Enolase</t> enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.
    Eno3 Rabbit Proteintech, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/eno3 rabbit proteintech/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    eno3 rabbit proteintech - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Sino Biological h07e 100 eno3 protein sino biological cat
    SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and <t>ENO3.</t> Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) <t>Enolase</t> enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.
    H07e 100 Eno3 Protein Sino Biological Cat, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/h07e 100 eno3 protein sino biological cat/product/Sino Biological
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    h07e 100 eno3 protein sino biological cat - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and ENO3. Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) Enolase enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    Article Title: Non-orthosteric inhibition of enolase 1 impedes growth of triple-negative breast cancer

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102451

    Figure Lengend Snippet: SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and ENO3. Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) Enolase enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.

    Article Snippet: During the loading step, recombinant His Tag-Enolases were immobilized on NTA Biosensors using a kinetic buffer (1X PBS) with a final reagent volume of 50 μL, which contained 50 μg/mL of ENO1 (#11554-H07E−100, Sino Biological) and ENO3 (#14270-H07E, Sino Biological), all placed in a black 384-well microplate.

    Techniques: Drug discovery, Labeling, Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, Expressing, Western Blot, SDS Page, Control, Enzyme Activity Assay, Positive Control

    SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and ENO3. Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) Enolase enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.

    Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

    Article Title: Non-orthosteric inhibition of enolase 1 impedes growth of triple-negative breast cancer

    doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102451

    Figure Lengend Snippet: SU212 targets ENO1 (A) Chemical structure of podophyllotoxin (parental compound) and SU212. (B–D) SU212 binds to ENO1 and ENO3. Target identification using CETSA: Differential profiling of SU212 on the thermal proteome profile of MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO or SU212 (0.5 μM) for 1.5 h and then lysed, and an equal quantity of soluble protein was labeled with a tandem mass tag, followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. (B) Heatmap representation of the thermal stability of 1,074 soluble proteins in cancer cells treated with vehicle-DMSO (left) and SU212 (right). (C) A scatterplot of melting temperature (T m ) calculated after SU212 and vehicle treatment. Proteins that passed the significant value thresholds ( p < 0.01, R2 > 0.8) and identification criteria are highlighted in orange. (D) Melting curves for ENO1/ENO3 with and without SU212 treatment depict the change in T m . (E) Representative sensorgrams for ENO1/3-SU212 interaction. His-tagged ENO1 and ENO3 proteins were immobilized on a Ni-NTA sensor, and SU212 (10 μM) was tested for physical interaction using BLI. (F) SU212 physically interacts with ENO1 protein. The BLI sensorgrams were obtained using His tag-ENO1-loaded Octet NTA biosensors and SU212 (1, 5, 10 μM). (G) SU212 treatment inhibits ENO1 expression. Immunoblotting: TNBC cells were treated with vehicle only (DMSO) and SU212 (0.1, 0.25, 0.5 μM) for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 and ENO3 proteins. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-beta-actin antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (H) SU212 treatment leads to degradation of the ENO1 protein. Immunoblotting: MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with combinations of SU212, CHX, MG132, 3MA, and NH4Cl, as depicted in the figure, for 6 h. SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis were performed for the ENO1 protein. Membranes were stripped and re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibody to ensure equal protein loading. (I) SU212 treatment induces apoptotic cell death in MDA-MB-231 cells. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 5). Numbers indicate a p value compared with the vehicle control and analyzed using two-way ANOVA. (J) Enolase enzyme activity assay. PC, positive control. Data are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3). Numbers indicate a p value that is different compared with vehicle control, analyzed using Student’s t test. ns, not significant.

    Article Snippet: The following primary and secondary antibodies were used: ENO1 (Abcam, # ab227978; 1:10000), ENO3 (Novus Biologicals, # NBP1-31764; 1:2000) β-actin (CST, #4970S; 1:10000), GAPDH (CST, #2118S; 1:10000), β-catenin (CST, #8480T; 1:1000), Lamin B1 (CST, #13435S; 1:1000), COX4 (CST, #38563; 1:1000), anti-mouse IgG HRP-linked antibody (CST, #7076, 1:5000), and anti-rabbit IgG HRP-linked antibody (CST, #7074, 1:5000).

    Techniques: Drug discovery, Labeling, Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, Expressing, Western Blot, SDS Page, Control, Enzyme Activity Assay, Positive Control